My point was that people on this list - not RunRev themselves - are
both more inclined and more able to offer workarounds where necessary
than they could possibly be to fix bugs. That is obviously RunRevs job.
I think some of the somewhat heated tenor of some posts recently has
been partly due to one or two professional programmers who are new to
Rev venting their newbie frustrations by suggesting that Rev couldn't
be used for serious work, when there are pros here who can prove that
assertion quite wrong, and partly due to the fact that the list is
overwhelmingly populated by users of Rev rather than the creators of
Rev, therefore, a complaining attitude is inappropriate. Email customer
service with complaints, ask for practical help on the list. And RTFM
:)
Mark Smith
On 30 Jun 2005, at 23:04, M Young wrote:
Mark Smith Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:22:37 +0100: I don't think anyone has
really suggested that you shouldn't mind. But it's the nature of this
list for people to offer workarounds and show examples of how they
deal with things. For what it's worth, I agree that the script editor
is buggy in it's formatting, but not so much that you can't work.
MY: It bothers when a tool that costs a lot of money is buggy. I want
the toaster of software development -- just plug it in and it works. I
see no reason for me to need workarounds.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
