I didn't know that, and trying it just now, it seems that rtf does not
preserve links, so html is probably the way to go. Thanks for pointing
that out.
Mark
On 3 Jul 2005, at 22:12, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark Smith wrote:
And finally, the RTF version, which is maybe a few milliseconds
faster, and has the possible advantage that the lower limit could be
< 8 if necessary.
I think there may be a problem with using rtfText, as only htmlText
preserves links.
Is that correct, or does rtfText now also preserve links?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
