Well, your model, as you point out is, sort of the way things are
done now. I think the idea of ransomware was to find an alternative
approach that would involve less legalistic stuff and more open sharing.
Clearly both models can co-exist with many others.
On Jul 19, 2005, at 8:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan,
Why not a capitalist/capitalist model:
1. Developer or users suggest a tool/product & define specs.
2. One or more developers bid to create the tool/product per
spec. at a
specific price
3. "Investors" provide the money and get "ownership" based on the
percentage they contributed
4. When the tool/product is finished all the investors get free
copies
5. As the finished tool/product is sold, profits are divided
among the
investors.
We are actually doing this now - except the developer and
investor are
usually the same person.
PL
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Shafer, Revolution Consultant and Author
http://www.shafermedia.com
Get my book, "Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought"
From http://www.revolutionpros.com, Click "My Stuff"
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
