Ken- Monday, July 25, 2005, 2:52:06 PM, you wrote:
KR> Sorry, Mark, but that is a weak argument, IMHO. It's not a private document KR> if anyone can access it (which anyone can). And BTW, the purpose of the KR> group is to help define the specification, which is necessary because it KR> isn't fully solidified. If you don't want to help solidify the spec, then I KR> guess you'll have to wait until it is made public. Well, no. There's no point in pushing the ECMI as a standard which developers should adopt as long as one has to join the working group in order to even view the draft. I'm fine with waiting until it's solidified before jumping in - that's why I'm deliberately *not* joining the yahoo group. I realize I can join the club at any time - that's not the issue. IMHO there's no point in evangelizing a "standard" that's not publicly available. Mind you, I think the ECMI is a good idea, things are just getting a bit cart-before-horsey here. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
