sez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>Now that it's pointed out to me, I see in the Doc
>under 'this' only mentions of 'this card' and 'this stack' . . . It
>seems a little counterintuitive, though, doesn't it? to have an
>apparent "plain English" command with what feels like an arbitrary
>limitation on its reference? Why shouldn't "this X" refer to
>whichever X is the "current" one of its kind (group, button,
>script . . .)?
When you use "this card", there is one single obvious candidate for which
card you're talking about, *regardless* of how many cards are in the stack.
When you use "this field" or "this button", that one single obvious candidate
would be... what?
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
