On 8/26/05 6:02 AM, "Mark Waddingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed, the engine is a little too forgiving in places but there are > actually two separate issues here - one related to tokenisation and one > related to parsing. Thanks for the clarification, Mark... it really helps me understand what's going on. > [ I'd also hope to convince people to stop using the shortened form of > control type keywords over time but I fear that if I am too vocal about > this I might run the risk of being pummeled with fruit ;o) ] How about the opposite? Stop using the *long* form... it means less typing and you get the same effect (see your subject line)... (he said, dodging fruit) ;-) > The motivation for giving this advice is a very pragmatic one: the > tighter the syntax of Transcript becomes, the more powerful it can be in > the future. The eventual result being a great reduction in the number of > lines of code you need to write to solve a particular problem. Agreed. Thanks, Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
