Sounds like even more 'Death by PowerPoint' ... Of course users want to be told how things should look.
But your point is well taken re: reading the originals. In case you might wonder why the knee-jerk reaction, I this term have ~30 upper-division university students (non-CS majors), and not a few of them: (a) don't know what a search engine is; (b) don't know the difference between an email addy and a URL; (c) don't use anything other than what MS pre-loads on their computer; (d) when given step-by-step instructions on using blogger, and told that they need to click on the little orange arrow to post their blog, WHEN, they don't see said little orange arrow, DON'T SCROLL DOWN TO LOOK FOR IT!!! (e) they were shocked when confronted with a quote from a MS executive, something to the efeect that, with respect to Encarta and its errors, the company considered it more important that the product be politically palatable than accurate (!). A report from in the trenches... :( Judy On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Scott Rossi wrote: > I believe the point of the article is that, according to user testing, the > majority of people prefer to edit an existing layout, rather than creating > one from scratch. Yes, MS is providing a set of layouts/templates for you > to choose from. Nowhere does it say anything about eliminating your ability > to create from scratch if you wish. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution