Hi Charles,
I use Sarah's Golden Rule and Richard's libraries concept as much as
possible. In one project I'm using a few giant script repository stacks
for everything that can be abstracted - actually they're just
super-sized libraries.
Also, I find my focus improves when I do some pre-planning... not the
funeral arrangements kind, but the flowcharts kind with paper and
pencil. I depict a process or system on paper with as non-computerish,
action-oriented labels and terms as possible, then desk-check my system
on paper to see if I covered everything, and then use the flowchart as a
roadmap in development of handlers and objects.
Regarding your question, this kind of project planning may result in
insight that helps you organize your code in a way that will be
intuitively obvious to you, so you'll just "know" where to look for
such-and-such kind of handler.
Phil Davis
Charles Hartman wrote:
I know this is going to sound like a *really* dumb question, if only
because it's so vague. But I'm wondering how people adjust their
workflow to the way Transcript's code is dispersed among many separate
scripts.
I keep getting lost. I keep forgetting where my code is that does
such-and-such. (Which script was that in?) So I keep losing track of
what I was about to do next, and my concentration falls apart. It's
making Rev *much* slower for me to program in than supposedly more
complicated languages like Python and C++.
Anybody think this makes any sense? Any hints how to think about it
differently?
Charles Hartman
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
