On 11/5/05 12:09 PM, "Geoff Canyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> filter theData with "*" & tab & "*word*" & tab & "*" & \ >>> tab & "*" & tab & "*" & tab & "*" & tab & "*" & tab & "*" >> >> Actually, you only need to add "*" right after the thing you're >> checking, >> and shouldn't need any more "*"s, so this should work just as well: >> >> filter theData with "*" & tab & "*word*" & tab & "*" > > That filter would match any line where "word" was in any item from > 2-7 of 8. To nail it down to the second item the filter string has to > include the tabs for all the items. Good catch, Geoff - I stand corrected! > Except for the fact that filter should probably be bugzilla'd for > being slow. Can anyone come up with an example where filter beats > "repeat for each?" Not that I can think of... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
