Sorry if I introduce myself in this posts. Please note that md5 is no more reliable! Since it was officially cracked.
Even Sha-0 was cracked, but it is far incomplete/primitive then sha-1, which is the only reliable hash system to verify digital signature, software integrity, etc... Sorry again... --Alessandro On 11/21/05, David Bovill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No but I need it badly for digital signatures! Don't think anyone > knows about this though :( > > > On 19 Nov 2005, at 03:10, Phil Davis wrote: > > > I don't know much about hashes - is SHA-1 enough better than Rev's > > md5digest to warrant paying someone to do it? Or will md5digest do > > what you need? > > > > Phil Davis > > > > > > Frank Leahy wrote: > > > >> Has anyone ported the SHA-1 algorithm to xTalk? (see http:// > >> www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/SHA-1.html for details) > >> If not, would anyone be willing to port it for $$? > >> Regards, > >> -- Frank > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution