Perhaps the market was already saturated for this type of tool in that given environment?
I regret that I didn't have a chance to ever work with LiveMotion (was there a Mac version available??? I seem to recall seeing a box in the department's SysAdmin's office, but when I inquired it was PC-only and I don't think even my PC-using colleage ever did anything with it, which, of course, has n o bearing on the usefullness of it). Judy On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Richard Gaskin wrote: > And yet while those inventive users suffer, there were never enough of > them to keep Adobe LiveMotion alive. > > As Scott Rossi can attest and I'll toss in a hearty "Amen!", LiveMotion > was truly "Flash for the rest of us." Everyone who ever spent more than > 20 minutes with both agreed that LiveMotion was far more accessible. > Borrowing the best of After Effects' award-winning timeline, LiveMotion > made simple and immediate sense out of so many things that were insanely > arcane in Flash. It didn't offer the full range of dynamic programming > capabilities as Flash had, but LiveMotion made short work of animations > and basic interactivity, certainly enough to handle much of what Flash > is commonly used for. > > But at the end of the day, Adobe couldn't find enough users who didn't > prefer the more professionally-oriented Flash to justify keeping > LiveMotion alive. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution