Richmond,

While I agree with your sentiment (I learned programming the same way, though a few years earlier), I don't see Transcript documentation as something to compare to other languages from the point of view of whose documentation is the worst.

I see what the documentation could be --as a competitive advantage to other languages by lowering the barrier to entry and mastery. Transcript is different enough from other popular languages, uses different terms and metaphors, and is so rich and complex in its capabilities that it takes understanding beyond the deceptively simple surface to get an idea of what one can really accomplish with it. Spend a year monitoring this list and you start to get the sense of it. However, as you pointed out, rather than just getting you feet wet, there is nothing like diving in and thrashing about a good while to figure it out. I am of that school of thought also.

However, I also know how frustrating it can be when stuff does not work the way you thought, or you don't even know how to ask the questions about what you want to accomplish. I continue to be amazed at the questions from newbies on this list. Most of the time I can't even figure out what they are asking, then along comes three answers from the ranks of experience that understand what the person was really asking in spite of what they said.

That was my dilemma about the documentation --how to provide an answer when the person does not even know how to ask the question. That is why I keep poking at the concept of documentation that can be indexed into by an outline from general to specific topics with more than one path to the specific information --and I am not talking about just the standard docs, but the wisdom of this list also.

Dennis


On Nov 27, 2005, at 7:33 AM, Mathewson wrote:

I learnt Hypercard without a book,
and I extended my knowledge, as RR extended xTalk, in the
same way:

by doing!

Ludwig Wittgenstein said that too many people Philosophise
and not enough DO PHILOSOPHY.

Now if we all DID Runtime Revolution:

i.e. got in there, got our feet wet, realised that (despite
a few itches) it really is just about the best
cross-platform RAD out there, and used the built-in
documentation as well as we are able to . . .

We would probably shut-up about the 'awful this and the
awful that'.

Although I am a mere 43 (I have a feeling Dan Shafer is
older) I started computer programming with FORTRAN 4 in
1975 - then BASIC, then PASCAL, ZILOG . . . those who moan
(I don't mean the odd 'twitch') and continue to moan about
RR's documentation and "lack-of-ease-of-use" ought to try
programming with one of those horrible Hollerith card
punchers:
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to