This distinction still irks me. I have never had the need to compile
any of my stacks, hypercard, metacard, or RR. But as I have written
thousands of them, and use them daily in my lab, I would count myself
as a ``pro'' user, not a ``hobbyist''. However, just because a
DreamCard-like model fits my needs doesn't mean that I don't need the
increasingly-many add-ons that come only with the ``pro'' version.
Hence, if a distinction needs to be made, stick to the one RR
sensibly chose: DreamCard for those who don't need to produce stand-
alone apps, and RR for those who do. The engine, add-ons, plug-ins,
cross-platform use, etc. should otherwise be the same for both. And
no one needs to be disparaged in the process.
On 1-Dec-05, at 2:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pondering the many posts in this thread I'm not sure I could
contribute
much of value, since Chipp covered many of my own thoughts, esp.
re. the
usefulness of a US presence and the need for a completely unambiguous
differentiation between the pro and hobbyist products.
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>
-Dr. John R. Vokey
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
