Yes, I know the alternatives, it's just that as we were discussing the limitations of Transcript's Englishness, I thought I would mention one place where it seems inconsistent.
Sarah On 12/4/05, Chipp Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could use: > > if "fred" is not in myVar then... > > ? > > Sarah Reichelt wrote: > >>...and that, of course, is the problem with Transcript being > >>"English-like"... you tend to think that it *should* respond to > >>English commands. In English > >> > >>hide field "xxx" and > >>if field "xxx" is hidden > >> > > > > > > The one that always irks me is "contains" and it's opposite. > > if myVar contains "fred" > > This is simple and obvious, but there isn't an easy way to reverse it, > > so you have to use: > > if myVar contains "fred" is false > > > > where I always feel you should be able to use something like: > > if myVar does not contain "fred" _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution