Mark,

It's not hard to round to integers. The problem is that Rev works with 
integers for its rotation algorithm and therefore corrupts the graphic in 
the process.

Bill

"Mark Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> While I agree that it would be handy if the engine could accept non- 
> integers for graphic points, a simple function to round a list of  4000 or 
> so points to integers took 34 milliseconds on my 1.5Ghz PB  G4...hardly 
> onerous in either execution time or coding effort.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On 5 Dec 2005, at 02:07, Jim Hurley wrote:
>
>>> Message: 7
>>> Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:16:29 -0500
>>> From: "Bill Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: Adventures in Rotation
>>> To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
>>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> #13) General flakiness. I would definitely say revCrumplePoly is a 
>>> better
>>> name for the revRotatePoly command. Is there any situation where
>>> revRotatePoly could be useful? Not if it does this. Totally  bugged. (I
>>> suspect the reason why is that Rev doesn't have fractional  coordinates?
>>> Could such a limitation really result in such dramatic distortion?  If 
>>> this
>>> is the case, then Rev should store fractionals, but render to 
>>> integers.)
>>
>>
>> Here, here. I have been promoting fractional coordinates for  graphic 
>> points for some time. Try the following handler:
>>
>> on mouseUp
>>   set the loc of me to 200.6,200.4
>>   put the loc of me into msg box--reveals 200,200
>>
>>   set the points of grc 1 to 100,100 & cr & 200.4,200.6
>>   --There is no evidence of the line graphic
>>   -- The fractional point is not truncated but interpreted as a  blank 
>> line.
>> end mouseUp
>>
>> RR will accept fractional coordinates for controls (it truncates  the 
>> coordinates) but it will not accept fractional graphic points.
>>
>> You don't get an error message and no feedback that the problem  lines in 
>> the fractional coordinates.
>>
>> Problems arises when the graphic points are computed; the  programmer may 
>> not realize that the points are fractional or that  RR will not accept 
>> fractional points. Any point with a fractional  coordinate is interpreted 
>> as an empty point and therefore a  discontinuity.
>>
>> It has been a while and I forget the details, but I think there was 
>> support for this change in RR; so far no implementation.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> 



_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to