Judy:
Perhaps you can explain why an apology is required by a person
defending themselves agains defamation? Whatever Chipp's intent was with
regard to whom he sent his posting, there can be no doubt of his intention
to defame. What precisely am I to apologize for?
As I've previously pointed out, those without an argument generally
resort to ad hominem. Thank you for proving my point.
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Perry
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:49 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: RE: Why isn't Rev more popular?
And, what you're doing is somehow better?
I doubt it...
At least Chipp had the decency to apologize; you apparently lack even that.
Judy
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Jerry Saperstein wrote:
>
> Sure, Chipp. I bet.
>
> Just a little acccident that happens to attempt to defame me.
>
> Yeah, Chipp, sure.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
