Sarah,
As I said below, the Variable watcher I was talking about is not
embedded yet, but is freestanding.
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Tool makers for the 21st century
http://www.daniels-mara.com/products
On Dec 24, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Yes please, I'd like to give it a go. I haven't contributed to this
debate because I don't feel strongly about the VW the way some do, but
when in Constellation, it irks to have to step outside to use the
variable watcher. It fees like it should be part of the same window,
perhaps replacing some other panel during a debug.
Cheers,
Sarah
On 12/25/05, Jerry Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Question for Variable Watching folks:
Why do we want a list of watched variables?
I ask this because I only want to see them if their value changes.
What if any value that changes is hilited?
That approach would be far more economical (processing time, and real
estate) AND I think it gives the desired effect--you get to watch any
variable whose value changes after the execution of a line of code.
But maybe I'm missing something. Before you answer that, read the
next paragraph, please.
NOTE for Constellation Users: If you would like to see the approach
to variable watching that I just mentioned, let me know and I'll
email you a non-released version of Constellation that has a free-
standing (non embedded) version of this variable watcher.
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Tool makers for the 21st century
http://www.daniels-mara.com/products
On Dec 24, 2005, at 3:11 PM, Jerry Daniels wrote:
Mark,
Good reason to have a folder of globals not being used in current
handler.
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Tool makers for the 21st century
http://www.daniels-mara.com/products
On Dec 24, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jerry-
Saturday, December 24, 2005, 10:03:29 AM, you wrote:
Good idea. YAP - Yet Another Preference. I've got the process of
adding prefs down to a science, now. It can take as little as 15
minutes.
Where you might want to display all globals is the case where
you've
made a typo in the name of one and have accidentally ended up with
two
globals. Just displaying the currently-in-use globals wouldn't
reveal
this, but displaying the whole list would. If you have to use
globals
I like the idea of being able to toggle the list.
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution