I don't know of any cases like this and it seems like it would be a pretty ineffective strategy but I wouldn't put it past anyone.
On 2/25/06, Jim Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <If and when > this patent gets prosecuted, it won't be against a small company. > Outfits that patent these kinds of things go after huge fish first and > hope everyone else falls into line thereafter. > > > Sometimes they go after a small fish whose legal defense funds they can > exhaust. Thus armed with a winning court precedent, they then reel in the > bigger fi$h. > > Jim Lambert > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author http://www.shafermedia.com Get my book, "Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought" >From http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution