> Is there a Transcript implementation of dot syntax? Or how > do non-dot people learn about the benefits of dots? If the > dot folks could wrap the dots within Transcript handlers, > maybe they could offer a dot library, like libDot. Or could > a macro language do the trick? What do dots enable that > Transcript does not?
Properties and methods. > Looking forward to more good humor on the list. :-) > The Entourage spell checker suggests replacing libDot with libido. Sexy object orientated code? Sounds good. <g> Scott _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
