I'll answer about the comments separately,when I've had more time to
think about it.
But - this one is quick ...
Dick Kriesel wrote:
But tokenizing seems unrelated to the challenge of getting a handler from a
script, because it can lose the control structure of a handler. For
example, consider the following handlers, whose bodies yield the same list
of tokens:
on a
if the seconds mod 2 = 0 then ask the date;ask the time
end a
on b
if the seconds mod 2 = 0 then ask the date
ask the time
end b
Those two bodies have the *same* meaning.
I suspect you have a different idea for what handler 'a' will do - in
fact, it *always" ask the time.
To see this more clearly, try
on mouseUp
if true then put "this" after msg; put "that" &cr after msg
if false then put "this" after msg; put "that" &cr after msg
end mouseUp
--
Alex Tweedly http://www.tweedly.net
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.6/286 - Release Date: 20/03/2006
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
