Jonathan -
Couldn't resist giving it a go... It works - perfectly! Except...
it's a bit slow. :-( Even on my G5 dual proc it takes about 2-3
seconds.
In this case, I'll have to decide if the visual improvement is worth
the speed penalty. But this may well be a useful technique for
future projects - it could "hide" a multitude of sins!
C
On 23 Mar 2006, at 18:21, Chris Carroll-Davis wrote:
Ah! Now Jonathan, this would definitely work! Great lateral
thinking. If I get time, I will have a go at this and let you know
the results.
Chris
You can get even fancier, by creating a new stack whose rect is
the screen
rect, containing an image of the screen, then change your stack
underneath,
then delete the cover stack.
On 23 Mar 2006, at 17:32, Jonathan Lynch wrote:
Also, what about making the stack invisible, then changing the
decorations,
then making it visible again?
You can get even fancier, by creating a new stack whose rect is
the screen
rect, containing an image of the screen, then change your stack
underneath,
then delete the cover stack.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
