> Why introduce confusion and exacerbate a perception of
 flightiness only to assist a branding effort which accounts
 for a scenario that never happened?

 It may be the case that Adobe, Macromedia, Netscape, Apple,
 Asymetrix, and other companies with strong market research
 departments are not entirely wrong on this.

If you'd like to send me the case studies used internally at these companies
to support your argument, it would go a long way in convincing one way or
the other.


As I said earlier, I don't see the change so significant really in either direction. I presume this was discussed heavily and the decision was not made lightly, although there are pros and cons for either. The only thing that makes me somewhat uncomfortable, on the second thought, is calling a programming language "revolution". Kinda odd, considering that it is a common word. May be a compromise could be to retain the name but don't call it be name in the marketing materials, simply referring to the scripting language OF Revolution. I find this more clear than "English-like Revolution is the easiest
scripting language available".

Robert
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to