Rodney: You really haven't thoroughly read what I have written. I have stated that I am not opposed to learning to program, but, rather, opposed to having to learn the skills with inadequate foundational learning material. What is Transcript really like, language wise? Other than the simple card analogy, what and why and how does it define other types of "custom" objects - the kind I want to make? When presented with only an API which tells a lot of "whats" without explaining why and when, or by taking apart a sample bunch of "code" that is written for purposes other than that which I specifically need to employ, I end up spending a lot of time working without understanding. This is largely wasteful.
I'm not asking for a tool that does everything for me. I'm asking for a computer language that lets me translate my organized thoughts and imagination into useful bits that, when assembled together, form working components of a total working system. And, it would be helpful if, along with such a language, came an insightful translation of the equivalent of words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs and finally, whole stories - especially if the language claims to be English-like. If English is the analogy, then the analogy needs to be explained, piece by piece, concept by concept. Maybe this is what does not exist. Greg Smith -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dependence-on-Programming-Experts-tf1893108.html#a5195060 Sent from the Revolution - User forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution