On 7 Jul 2006, at 21:02, Garrett Hylltun wrote:
I think at the moment I'd better stick to using send until I can find out whether the engine will get mucked up by using just the handler name.
For doing what you're doing, I think 'send' is the way to go. Since you're putting waits in there anyway, any small speed advantage from not using 'send' is irrelevent anyway, and I think you would be buliding up a potentially enormous amount of recursion the other way, though you should get a 'too much recursion' error rather than a crash, as such.
Best, Mark _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
