OK, true, Apples seems to take it's time getting the Windoz version of
any given QT upgrade
ported over to DOS (must be an engineering night mare) But at least at
present I think they
are close. Windows users are able to get a QT 7.0 version now. But my
worry is that
even if they are publicly touting that the QT version is uptodate, in
fact its API on Windows
is still deficient. On the other hand, we have windows users who say
they never have a problem
so, goes to hardware, configuration etc. over which no one has control...
I don't know how anyone could debug this kind of thing...That's
worrisome as it makes
both your Application and Revolution look really bad... and you have
nothing to offer
the user by way of a solution.
Stephen Barncard wrote:
In all fairness to MS, I've heard that the version of QT for windoze
is at least a version or two behind MacOS. That's not exactly bridge
building.
sqb
Is Micro$oft still doing that stuff to break others' competing
products? I thought they got busted and had to stop.
sqb
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
