Roger.E.Eller wrote:
On Sep 24, 2006, at 7:37 PM, Chip Walters wrote:
Perhaps it's time for Galaxy to consider becoming like MetaCard, a
complete seperate IDE for the Rev engine.
If Galaxy produced a commercial IDE replacement, wouldn't that be in
violation of the prime directive? I mean, I remember way back, reading in
the license agreement that you can create anything you wish with
Revolution EXCEPT software that directly competes with RunTime and its
IDE.
Actually it's the opposite: an IDE is just a collection of stacks, but
all stacks need the engine to run, and need a licensed engine to edit
scripts.
So regardless of whether the Rev IDE is running, you still need a Rev
license to edit scripts.
That's the beauty of it: RunRev can watch a thousand flowers bloom (as
Scott Raney used to say), and still all roads lead back to Rev.
Any third-party IDE must rely on a Rev sale to be operational. A
win-win-win for all....
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
