Jerry Daniels wrote:
I certainly wouldn't cry if that happened, although now i use the same device to put a stack into memory. I admit it is a "back handed" way to do things, tho.
And with the proposed consistency in honoring the destroyStack property, you could still do that effortlessly by just leaving that property in its default setting of false.
-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
