10.3.9 followed by 10.3.10? Not 10.3.9.1? Not 10.4.0? Not 10.3.91?
How much easier to have 10.03009 followed by 10.03010.
Or if it is a more significant update: 10.04000.
One of the biggest advantages of the "point 5" system is the ability
to run the same sequence for builds and customer releases. The way I
use it: the digits to the left of the decimal are the version; the
two digits to the right of the decimal are for customer releases and
the last three are for builds (or really minor updates). It is
really easy to release a build at any time, it's already numbered!
Paul Looney
Life-long build serialization works fine if you do not create
branches of your products. Theoretically, we could be getting further
fixes for Rev 2.6 line while 2.7 is already out. Some of the
complaints about having to pay for bug fixes with new features evolve
around lack of branching with Rev. Or so it seems.
Robert
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
