On 11/17/06, Dar Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Matt wrote:
> I was recently creating a stack when I noticed that one of my
> functions
> wouldn't work right. After some further investigation, i realized
> that the
> function was not getting the second param that I was passing it.
> So, just
> for fun, I swapped the two params in the function and in the
> script, and now
> the other variable always turned up empty. If anyone could shed
> light on
> this problem i would appreciate it.
Try this as the first line of the function to see if the problem is
that the parameter is empty or the number of parameters is wrong:
put the paramCount
I would guess a problem in spelling, either in the function or in its
test.
If the parameter is an array directly returned by another function,
you have run across an old bug (3411). You will have to split up the
expression. If the parameter is an array returned by the object
version of value(), then the value is lost by value() (bug 699). If
the parameter is 'the result' after a send (not in time), then the
array is lost then, too.
Someone on the list recently had a problem with a function and later
realized he had also defined it another place.
Dar Scott
***************
Underlying most arguments against the free market
is a lack of belief in freedom itself.
-- Milton Friedman (1912-2006)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Thank you for your suggestions. But I will tell you that it goes to the
right function because I put a breakpoint in the script editor and the
debugger opened up the right function. The parameters are not arrays, one of
them is the absolute path to a folder, and the other being a string of
filenames seperated by commas. I did get it to work, but i had to use the
value function. The way I was calling it before I used value was:
put functionname(tfolder,tfiles) into temp
And yes, tfolder and tfiles were set before calling it, those lines of
script didn't change when using the value function.
--
Computer Geek Software
Send in your own suggestions.
http://compgeekware.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
