On 11/28/06 6:23 PM, "Brian Yennie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Seems like especially now that RR will be bundling Chipp's browser >> plugin, a better direction might be just *replacing* the user's >> browser, since web technologies (like Flash) can now run in a stack. > > But what user has any desire to replace their web browser with > another application that just has the same web browser embedded > inside of it? This has been the biggest hurdle for me... clients that (regardless of whether you agree with them or not), want to be able to open their browser of choice, go to a page, click on a link or button on the page, and display Rev stacks *without* having to go to the trouble of forcing their customers to download the Player, run an install to hook up the stack to the Player, etc. I have been very good at convincing my clients that the development and internet capabilities of Rev are such that it is in their best interest that I develop these applications in Rev, but it is the hurdle I mention above that has actually caused me to be forced to duplicate chunks of Transcript code/interfaces into HTML/etc. so that it could be operated "from the browser". Unfortunately I've been unable to convince anyone to use a custom browser either (that is, a Rev standalone with altBrowser embedded), for the same reason - people want to use *their* browser, and not download anything, just click links. These are non-sensical arguments, true, but they *are* real, unfortunately... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
