On Dec 6, 2006, at 6:24 PM, Dick Kriesel wrote:

I Googled "'private handler' site:lists.runrev.com" and similar terms
without finding the answer. If the topic's been covered and I missed it,
please excuse me.

Some folks use a prefix for library command and function names and an extension of that for the private names.

I think your checking method is pretty clever and can be handy. Though the cost of a couple lines and a few microseconds might be much for small handlers, this might work OK for larger handlers.

You might be interested in feature request 1443 listed in Bugzilla.

Dar Scott

"Revolution is just the beginning."
                -- Rose Wilder Lane


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to