Yes I know, that's why I am asking. I would think that even a 180MB stack ( I assume this size, because his app setup is about 180MB) of Jim would be very uncomfortable, but he seems to be happy with it? Tiemo
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Richard Gaskin > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2007 20:05 > An: How to use Revolution > Betreff: Re: AW: protecting images in standalone? > > Tiemo wrote: > > Jim, that sounds great, but doesn't the performance suffer badly, when > > including 180MB of videos into you stack, even if it is one or more > > substacks, when opening and accessing the stack? What do you think where > is > > the limit with doing like that? I will create an app with about 6GB of > video > > material, splitted into 18.000 clips :) > > I think you've brought up an important consideration, Tiemo. When Rev > loads a stack file, it reads the entire stack file into memory, and > custom properties come along for the ride. > > On modern systems, a couple megs of images probably won't matter, but > embedding a 6GB video would almost certainly exceed available RAM, and > on some systems may even exceed swap space. > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Managing Editor, revJournal > _______________________________________________________ > Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
