Bernard, > My previous private communications with Runrev are precisely what has led > me to have so little respect for them and their ability to set > expectations. And in case you haven't been paying attention - bug 3196 > had received NO attention until I made this more generalized critique.
I find it increasingly ironic that the apparent trigger for this campaign of yours was a request from me to beta members to help identify remaining outstanding issues that needed special attention. Forget that such a request didn't have to be made. You replied to the request, and contrary to your claims it definitely got the "special attention" you wanted, as it is marked in a special internal field set up for the purpose in the RQCC and is in another database we're using to strategize/organize how to tackle those issues. How is this is anything except you being upset about not getting the response you expected to a particular email on a single bug? _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
