Chipp,
If Rev could only be done in this manner, I'd run from it as fast as
I could. Why do you think I liked HC? I spent years trying out all
the other languages, from Fortran thru Assembler to VisualBasic and
FutureBasic. The latter two were acceptably useful, but still not as
good as HC. Even the Externals written using CompileIt were pretty
much pure HC, with slight sidesteps; very useful and generated very
fast code. The only reason I'm not still using HC is the obvious one.
Apple dropped supporting and extending it to meet the new demands of
our current systems.
So, I still think, though I'm sure you are right that Dick has done
and does a remarkable job; it's not my piece of cake. If this is the
evolving direction of Rev, it is the wrong one. Just MHO.
Joe Wilkins
On May 28, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
On 5/26/07, Joe Lewis Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dick,
I admire in cleverness of all this, but the code is even worse to
comprehend than assembly language.
Not really. Joe, once you've been programming Rev as long as Dick has,
this stuff is just plain english.
Dick, nice job on the 'stream of consciousness' code writing. You seem
to always have some of the slickest and most novel approaches to code
snippets. I try and never miss one of your posts. ;-)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
