I was wondering about the speed of using filemaker with a RunRev front end in comparison to using RunRev with SQLite or Valentina.
I have been using SQLite and don't have very many records but do some convoluted SQL that is fairly slow (many joins). I also use SQLitemanager in conjunction with my RunRev front end as it saves me from writing a lot of stuff that the SQLitemanager already does well. It is also excellent for testing SQL. I would like to try Valentina and compare but have been unable to import my SQLite database into Valentina's demo for testing. It always chokes on something in my data that it doesn't like. I have also been thinking about using filemaker with the RunRev frontend because filemaker has lots of stuff already done for me (much more than the SQLitemanager) so using it in conjunction with RunRev might be a really powerful solution. EXCEPT I haven't tested the speed of accessing filemaker databases through RunRev yet. Anyone done this? On 5/31/07 3:34 AM, "Peter Alcibiades" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its the kind of thing which would take me all of an hour in Filemaker complete > with the csv import | | | _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution