Yes JB, Desktop apps will always be better than web applications. Web applications are a step back in computing since we went the last decade in a direction and now we're reversing it. For remote computing we have X11 and NX, much better protocols than anything AJAX and Web have ever granted us.
The only reason for a web app is the "virtual" presence of a browser in everything that holds a CPU... even my Nintendo DS has a Opera!!!! So right now, if you want to jump into the iPhone bubblewagon (I just invented the term bubblewagon) and deliver something this week so that you hit the press and the online spots in the week of the launch, the only way to go is thru HTML + CSS + JAVASCRIPT. but again, nothing beats real desktop apps. Andre On 6/25/07, jbv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andre Garzia a *crit : > > 1) The client side which is HTML + CSS + Javascript. This is your interface > and the logic that binds itself with a server. You can't do that in Rev, but > you can create tools in Rev to help you build and testproof your javascript > + HTML + CSS stuff. Javascript is a fine language too. the "only" problem is that coding the client side in HTML + CSS + Javascript is rather cumbersome (compared to coding a GUI with Rev). Furthermore, js can't be compared to Transcript : much slower and limited... JB _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
