At 3:45 AM -0500 11/15/01, Curry Kenworthy wrote: >Is that normal? Rev 1.0 took up pretty much too, but 1.1 seems to take even >more. I don't mind installing some more memory if that's what it takes, but >it really is shockingly large! I know Rev handles a lot, and I'm not too >much of a spoilsport to go and buy some memory, but all the same I don't >think it would hurt to try to make Rev a little friendlier in this aspect!
Sorry, I haven't explored this very much, but I can offer that the memory demands are largely a development-time issue. A standalone can run in as little as 4mb assigned memory (although it will grab a bit more at runtime). It's not small enough, but it is much less than the development environment takes. gc
