Wow, I gotta read the docs. :-)
BTW: What's the "argumentName" attribute for? Can C# introspect on the argument names?
Cheers,
Clinton
On 7/17/06,
Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DataMapper 1.5 supports this notation (IBATISNET-155):
<resultMap id="account-result-constructor" class="Account" >
<constructor>
<argument argumentName="id" column="Account_ID"/>
<argument argumentName="firstName" column="Account_FirstName"/>
<argument argumentName="lastName" column="Account_LastName"/>
</constructor>
</resultMap>
--- Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Java land I was thinking of simply adding the following to the
> current
> <result> element...
>
> Currently we can do:
>
> <result property="FirstName" column="FIRST_NAME" />
>
> I'd like to add...
>
> <result field="_firstName" column="FIRST_NAME"/> <!-- I'm not
> advocating underscores -->
>
> ...and...
>
> <result column="FIRST_NAME" />
>
> The latter (which lacks both property and field attributes) would be
> a
> constructor parameter. It would have to follow some rules:
>
> 1) Constructor results must come first in the result map defn.
> 2) Constructor results must be in the same order as the
> parameters of
> the constructor.
>
> I think constructor and field support would be awesome in both the
> .NET and
> Java versions.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Clinton
