Ok. It's the only one solution. Thank you. ________________________________
De: Henrik Uffe Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: jeu. 19-avr.-07 14:39 À: [email protected] Objet : Re: iBatis.Net - Optimistic concurrency control Timestamp is a property on the object, so only one parameter (the object) is passed Employee.FirstName Employee.LastName Employee.TimeStamp With Toms solution then there is a property called OriginalObject on the object to update as far as I understand the solution, so again only one parameter Employee.FirstName Employee.LastName Employee.OriginalObject.FirsName Employee.OriginalObject.LastName regards Henrik Uffe Jensen Corewit ----- Original Message ----- From: Philippe Peuret <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:20 PM Subject: RE : iBatis.Net - Optimistic concurrency control I agree with your two solutions, but each time, there is two diferrent parameter in the SQL query : the first parameter is the Object to update (with all its data) and the second parameter is the timestamp or a second object which contains data of the original object. So, how do you do to pass two parameters to the SQL query ? In the examples below, you can see only one parameter for the current object "Employee" : <update id="UpdateEmployee" parameterClass="Employee"> UPDATE dbo.Employee SET FirstName = #_firstNam#, LastName = #_lastName#, SSN = #_ssn# WHERE EmployeId = #_employeeId# AND [Timestamp] = #_timestamp# </update> or <update id="UpdateEmployee" parameterClass="Employee"> UPDATE dbo.Employee SET FirstName = #_firstName# , LastName = #_lastName# , SSN = #_ssn# WHERE FirstName = #OriginalObject._firstName# AND LastName = #OriginalObject._lastName# AND SSN = #OriginalObject._ssn# </update> ________________________________ De: Henrik Uffe Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: mer. 18-avr.-07 20:43 À: [email protected] Objet : Re: iBatis.Net - Optimistic concurrency control Another solution : Make timestamp column (SQL Server but probably similary data types in other databases). This column is automatically updated by sql server each time the row is changed, so you know that if the timestamp column has changed since you pulled out the data then there is a concurrency violation. So in your updates / deletes you add [Timestamp] = #_timeStamp# to your where clause, for example UPDATE dbo.Employee SET FirstName = #_firstNam#, LastName = #_lastName#, SSN = #_ssn# WHERE EmployeId = #_employeeId# AND [Timestamp] = #_timestamp# You can then use the rows affected returned by the Delete/Update methods on the SqlMapper, and if it's 0 then at there is a concurrency violation and you can throw an exception or whatever you do. regards Henrik Uffe Jensen ----- Original Message ----- From: Nguyen, Tom <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:04 PM Subject: RE: iBatis.Net - Optimistic concurrency control Unless I'm behind on my knowledge, I don't believe that iBatis.Net has automatic optimistic concurrency implementation. You will have to implement this yourself. This is the pseudo of how I implemented mine: BusinessBase<T> : IClonable -Clone() -OriginalObject AS T Employee : BusinessBase<Employee> -SSN -FirstName -LastName 1. Retrieve Employee 2. Clone Employee and store in OriginalObject 3. Employee is parameter class of Update Ibatis Mapping UPDATE dbo.Employee SET FirstName = #_firstName# , LastName = #_lastName# , SSN = #_ssn# WHERE FirstName = #OriginalObject._firstName# AND LastName = #OriginalObject._lastName# AND SSN = #OriginalObject._ssn# Unless you have build some kind of framework to do this, it is a lot of manual, repetitive work. Only do it when you really need to. Regards, Tom Nguyen Sr. Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ________________________________ From: Philippe Peuret [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 7:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: TR: iBatis.Net - Optimistic concurrency control Hello, How to use the optimistic concurrency control when we update the database with iBatis.Net ? Because, when we use the <insert> or <update> elements, we can only pass one parameter : the object to insert or to update. But there is no other parameter to pass the data to the optimistic concurrency control. Thank you for your help. ________________________________ This e-mail message and any files transmitted herewith, are intended solely for the use of the individual(s) addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of this message to such person) you may not review, use, disclose or distribute this message or any files transmitted herewith. If you receive this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and all copies of it from your system. ________________________________
<<winmail.dat>>
