Hi David, thanks a lot for your reply - We've just decided to do that switch to 2.1.5. Do you mean by activation that we have to build up a new magnolia 2.1.5. parallel to our existing one(s) and activate our content from the 2.1 RC 3 instance into the 2.1.5 cms? Would be great if I could come back to you on that issue when we're actually doing the upgrade.
Thanks again, chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. September 2006 12:00 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [magnolia-user] AW: [magnolia-user] Question: Magnolia 2.1 RC 3 Availability I believe you would achieve a fair performance improvement with 2.1.5. Jackrabbit (the JCR implementation) in your version was still very much in development.There was also movement away from the file system store. Memory fades on this but the templates should work as is. You will have to use activation to move your repository content from 2.1 RC3 to 2.1.5 . --David Christian P. Praher wrote: > Hi David, > > the reason for this is that we started our project in July/August 2005 and > back then this was the most current release. > Could we expect a big benefit from changing to 2.1.5.? > Also, could there be any incompatibilities concerning templating or so, or > shouldn't be that an issue? > > chris > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. September 2006 11:26 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [magnolia-user] Question: Magnolia 2.1 RC 3 Availability > > Current release is 2.1.5. Is there a reason for using 2.1RC3? > > -David > > Christian P. Praher wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> we're running a commercial site (with newsletter functionality) that >> > should > >> soon be expanded to a shop-system on top of magnolia 2.1 RC 3. Basically >> everything works fine and I like Magnolia and Jackrabbit (with its >> > intuitive > >> XML-Paths) very much. >> The only severe problem that we're having at the moment is that we're >> > having > >> an extremely low availability. Every 5 or 6 hours in seems as if the >> > server > >> (tomcat) completely shuts down. The very bad thing is, that we can't find >> any information in the Catalina.out-Log. Could this be a deadlock-issue or >> something like this? Our JVM is 1.5 - could that be a problem? >> >> Does anyone have a clue what this might be? We're currently persisting >> Jackkrabbit to the file-system. Has anyone running a larger application >> > have > >> any experiences on that? Is it possible to run a large system just with >> filesystem persistence or is there a preferred, more robust way, e.g. >> persistence to a DB? >> >> Thanks for any information, any comment would be highly appreciated since >> you know availability is THE key issue for a online shop. >> >> Thanks again, >> >> chris >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> for list details see >> http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > -- David Smith Network Operations Supervisor Department of Entomology Cornell University 2132 Comstock Hall Ithaca, NY 14853 Phone: (607) 255-9571 Fax: (607) 255-0940 ---------------------------------------------------------------- for list details see http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- for list details see http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html ----------------------------------------------------------------
