> > I would say you need to specify what sections you wish to be 508 > compliant. If it is just the editing o content blocks (paragraphs) > you could provide alternative entry options easily. >
Actually, the "Website" and "Documents" view (the interactive trees), are what I'm most concerned about. I think it's awesomely easy-to-use and functional, and we'd *love* to re-use it (if that's possible...), but I'm thinking it's not 508-compliant by virtue of its reliance on JS for navigation and node management (i.e., creating, moving, and deleting). We are going to run AccVerify (http://www.hisoftware.com/access/newvIndex.html) on AdminCentral and a few of the default dialogs today, and I can let you know the results if you'd like (I'll email them to you). We may have to create our own UI, or we may be able to get around the 508 requirement for the admin screens somehow, by stating that creating, designing and formatting web pages requires visual ability. Either way, it's good to hear that Magnolia is that flexible. Thanks for the response, Boris! ---------------------------------------------------------------- for list details see http://documentation.magnolia.info/docs/en/editor/stayupdated.html ----------------------------------------------------------------
