It is apparent that something is wrong with uml_switch (though I don't know the code and I'm not going to express technical opinion, only "management" one).
Yes, the fact that a core file has sat in the directory for almost 2 years says something. :)
Steve, merging at least the earlier of your patches (they are splitup The Right Way(tm)) might be done soon, without lots of discussions.
Thanks. I havn't noticed any problems with the changes I've made so far.
If you feel so, you might split uml_switch from the rest (but remember the user point of view - two packages doubles the setup time).
Who is this directed to? Who is the maintainer at the moment anyways?
If you are good guys (and you are), I think you can sort out by discussing it
here (I'm just against the creation of a separate ML for that development -
things don't work that way).
So, the ball is over to you. In this moment, Gerd Knorr seems the one who has
the time and the position (working in SuSE) to manage it well (he can push
updates to its users and so on, for instance) but it's just my little 2
cents.
I'd be happy with Gerd as maintainer. I'd nominate myself, but I have no system that I can dedicate to the project. I also have a hard time saying no to interesting ideas.
Steve Schmidtke
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
