I've verified the compilation problem posted about -rc1: arch/um/kernel/process.c: In function `check_ptrace': arch/um/kernel/process.c:321: error: `PTRACE_SETOPTIONS' undeclared (first use in this function) arch/um/kernel/process.c:321: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once arch/um/kernel/process.c:321: error: for each function it appears in.) arch/um/kernel/process.c:321: error: `PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD' undeclared (first use in this function)
This is related to the TRACESYSGOOD patch and to an unverified patch, i.e. : http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I.e, the "Code Tidying" patch still on the incrementals. In fact, including both linux/ptrace.h and sys/ptrace.h is not redundant - it must also be done in the proper order, so I'm writing a patch with the appropriate content. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
