On Friday 14 January 2005 00:52, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > I just verified this on a Debian install and an FC2 install. > > Moving from 2.6.9-bb4 to 2.6.10-um vanilla, top reports either 100% user, > or 100% idle. > > [2.6.10] # cat /proc/stat > cpu 645 1 0 0 0 0 0 > cpu0 645 1 0 0 0 0 0 > intr 63462 54820 0 174 10 8270 93 0 0 0 0 1 94 0 0 > ctxt 108849 > btime 1105659428 > processes 1542 > procs_running 2 > procs_blocked 0 > > [2.6.9-bb4] # cat /proc/stat > cpu 407 0 1989 7536 252 28 1 > cpu0 407 0 1989 7536 252 28 1 > intr 15430 10185 0 48 1 5035 134 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 > ctxt 10966 > btime 1105660071 > processes 1501 > procs_running 1 > procs_blocked 0 > > Looks like some information is missing from /proc/stat in 2.6.10. > > -Chris Try retesting after applying update-process-times.patch (the one for the crash you were seeing): that patch was not merged by maintainers in mainline, though IIRC it was sent in the right time frame (maybe because they weren't marked as urgent, or because they were a lot of patches, which is also possible).
About this, we should try for the future (even if this one was a special case, having to merge tens of invasive patches for security purposes is not nice) to merge big things only before -rc1 and -rc2, since after those releases things must calm down. This recommendation must be updated with changes in the release cycle followed by Linus, obviously. Bye -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
