On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
> UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
> These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64.
The COMMAND_LINE_SIZE patch was required because this was conflicting with
the userspace s390 COMMAND_LINE_SIZE? I think this is true because in the
kernel, asm-s390/setup.h doesn't get pulled in.
This stems from the fact that my tree had add_arg in os-Linux/util.c, which
seems wrong. Blaisorblade had it moved to um_arch.c, which is right, and
where it is in my tree now. So, I think UML_COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is not needed,
and I've removed it.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
