On Sunday 01 May 2005 18:07, Al Viro wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:30:57PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > For now I've added an #ifdef to re-include that code for x86, while > > excluding it for x86_64. Also, is that up-to-date wrt. 2.6.12-rc3? > > Yes, it is. As for the ptrace.c... IMO the right thing is > per-architecture helper here. Such ifdefs are OK when it's just i386 and > amd64. As soon as e.g. uml/s390 gets merged or uml/ia64 and uml/ppc get > resurrected... Agreed, I've done it this way to reintroduce for now the code for i386. It's anyway kludgy, since amd64 has too its debug registers to handle (at least it should); it's just that UML does not handle them yet. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso" Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
