On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:04:13PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> I could move maybe move sigsetjmp to kernelspace code;
How are you going to get a definition of jmp_buf in there?
> however, another
> possibility would be to use the exception handler tables we've always
> supported without using them (only drawback is that the code *must* be
> inlined, and possibly the need for some assembler code, which however is
> probably avoidable).
Maybe. That's worth looking in to. I've used the setjmp scheme in preference
to that because it's portable, but maybe we should switch back in some places.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
