Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 21:19, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Maybe, we really should use sigsuspend() instead of pause(), but the
reason for this isn't to remove the winch_handler.
The current loop in winch_thread() might miss a SIGWINCH, if a SIGWINCH
comes in while winch_thread() isn't waiting in wait().
wait()? You mean the pause()/sigsuspend() call, right? Then I probably agree.
Yes. You are right. Stupid typo.
Bodo
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
