> > UML running in SKAS3 mode > > Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK > > Kernel virtual memory size shrunk to 28311552 bytes > This is running in SKAS3 mode - see message. However, the problem may be TT > in > the meaning you'd better probably disable it. I enabled both to make it easier to test each mode, oh well... Noted.
> > What's this about shrinking vm size? (reducing the mem gets rid of this > > warning) > By how much? If you tried to pass it 1G of mem it's ok it complains (when TT > mode is enabled and HIGHMEM disabled it doesn't work - disabling TT should > fix this). HIGHMEM was disabled, but mem=512M so this shouldn't matter, right? It stopped complaining at about mem=200M (roughly IIRC) > > # uname -a > > Linux mamba 2.6.12-skas3-v9-pre4 #2 Thu Jun 23 16:28:29 GMT i686 AMD > > Athlon(tm) XP 2000+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux > > I tried the same filesystem as ext3 but that made no difference. > > Guest is 2.6.14-rc1 > > > Same kernel in skas3/skas0 works occasionally! But when it does not: > > > [42949374.340000] VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. > > [42949384.250000] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! > Does the box locks up thereafter? Jeff has been seeing these for some time, > but IIRC the box didn't lock up. (Jeff, what's the actual situation?). The host is fine... so far. > > * Good points: > > pcap works really well. > > I just wished there was a way to easily figure out which libraries need > > to be included in the chroot to make it work (beyond lipcap) > Idea: try using ltrace with focus on dlopen (from libdl). I'll do that and post the results. > > * Some other small issues: > > when building IPv6 & pcap, I get: > > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.6/../../../libc.a(in6_addr.o)(.rodat > >a+0x10): multiple definition of `in6addr_loopback' > > > (This has been the case with the last few releases) > It's a name conflict with libc... ugh, means adding another -D like > -Derrno=kernel_errno in the same place. It's trivial, but it's getting > boring. > Attached the fix. > > A question: is it ok to be mentioned in the patch changelog? It was suggested > to do so to give a bit of reward to testers - just I don't know if I should > or not, and secondly if I should put your email or not. Anything for credits ;-) BTW, I can't contribute patches (I can code in C, but not kernel code) - however I can provide free hosting, disk space, etc to all the uml hackers that ask. Feel free include my email, in the worst case it will train my spam filters! Antoine ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
