On Wednesday 26 October 2005 00:44, Blaisorblade wrote: > For what I see, that's based on the tradeoff between space and contention - > for instance there are few zones only, so there's no big waste.
If space is precious it shouldn't be padded at all. > In practice, interpreting !X86_GENERIC as "I will run this kernel on _this_ > processor" could also be done. That is what it always meant yes. > However, in case you didn't note, max_align is never enough on EM64T > currently, right? I will prepare patches for .15 to remove it completely, that should fix that problem. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
